In the text of the Inquisition,
David talks about "we Cumbrians" and describes Cumbria as a region
situated between England and Scotland [2]. The Maitland Club's reprint of William
Hamilton's Descriptions of the
Sheriffdoms of Lanark and Renfrew [3] notes that the then county of
Cumberland only represented a part of the ancient territory of Cumbria.
David describes Cumbria as being
situated between England and Scotland. The language of the Cumbrians was a
sister dialect of Welsh, Cornish and Breton. We do not know what they called it
themselves ( though we could make an educated guess that it was something like Cömbraeg) but in his book Language and History in Early Britain [4], Kenneth Jackson coins the name "Cumbric" for the language of the Cumbrians.
David talks about the Cathedral of Glasgow being the seat of
the Cumbrian bishop. The cathedral is dedicated to St Mungo or Kentigern and
churches dedicated to Kentigern can be found across the territory that was
Cumbrian.
In 1291, the Canons and Priors of Carlisle composed
the Cronica de Karleoli from
documents in their possession and informed King Edward I of England that
Cumbria had consisted of the bishoprics of Glasgow, Carlisle and Candida Casa -
that is Whithorn in Galloway - and that it had extended south from Carlisle to
the River Duddon [5]. The Victoria History of Cumberland quotes the Scottish chronicler,
Wyntoun, as placing the south-east boundary of Cumbria as the Rere Cross on
Stainmore. Phythian-Adams did a detailed
analysis of land holdings in English Cumbria just after the Norman take-over.
He noted that the area around Millom (but north of the Duddon), was in the
Domesday Book, and probably went with Lancashire until it was added to Copeland
(part of Cumberland) later [6]. On page 9 of his Land of The Cumbrians, his map shows the
boundary of the diocese of Carlisle, set up by the Normans, but possibly
representing some earlier boundary. I have noticed over the years, that that
most of the Cumbric names are within the diocesian boundaries, with the
exception of a group around Cartmel (which may be an group of Britons with
archaic naming patterns - see below) and a line of names that runs down the
western fellside from Cockermouth, taking in Lamplugh, Mockerkin and going as
far as the river Esk at Ravenglass, broadly following the main line of
communication down the coast.
In the Cronica
de Karleoli, the Canons of Carlisle are careful to describe a previous
Anglo-Saxon King Edward in 924 as king of the English, Cumbrians, Danes, Scots
and Britons (presumably the Welsh or Cornish).
In 1059 the monks refer to Malcolm, King of the Cumbrians. They also
make the point that the Earl of Northumbria, Cospatricius (Gospatric) in 1070
was Cumbrian (as his name suggests).
The Cumbrians appear as a separate ethnic group in
the Battle of the Standard in 1138 when they take their place next to the men
of Teviotdale in the Scottish second line. David had been ceded "English"
Cumberland from England in 1135, territory which he possibly regarded as
rightfully his as Prince of the Cumbrians.
Despite being Prince of the Cumbrians, David, was certainly
not one of them. He was a Norman. In his Inquisition,
he (or whoever wrote the text for him says on his behalf) that he does not rule
the whole of the Cumbrian territory. Edmonds wonders whether this is because
the Cumbrian lands to the south of the Solway were not in his hands at this
time [7]
No comments:
Post a Comment